Intel xeon hexa 6 core vs i7 4790k drivers#The drivers utilized for the Radeon card were Catalyst 15.7.1 for Windows 10, and the drivers utilized for the GeForce card were GeForce 353.62 for Windows 10. Note that due to Nvidia’s GPU Boost 2.0 feature, the 980 Ti operated at 1202MHz/7000MHz at almost all times. We ran all tests at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, except where specified, and our video cards were set to reference speeds, which translates to 947MHz/5000MHz for the Radeon R9 2/7000 for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. SSD #2: 2x Samsung 850 Evo 500GB in RAID0.Video Card #2: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB (representing high-end).CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K (overclocked to 4.4GHz).Our hex-core test system consisted of the following components: Video Card #2: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB (representing high-end).Video Card #1: Sapphire Radeon R9 290 4GB (representing mid-range).CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K (overclocked to 4.4GHz).We performed our quad-core benchmarks on the following test system: One would think that the added memory bandwidth, in combination with the extra cache, should be enough to push the 5820K ahead of the 4790K in all gaming scenarios, even where extra cores aren’t helpful. We shall soon see if that proves to be true! The 4790K uses the Z97 platform, while the 5820K uses the X99 platform, the latter which features a more robust quad-channel DDR4-based memory architecture. Of course, there’s one other major difference between the two processors, and that is the platform. To even the playing field, we overclocked both processors to 4.4GHz for our benchmark tests. That being said, the 4790K is clocked at 4.0 GHz out of the box, with Turboboost to 4.4GHz, while the 5820K is clocked at 3.3GHz with Turboboost to 3.7GHz. Both feature Hyperthreading, which brings the 5820K up to 12 total logical cores and the 4790K up to 8 cores. Both chips are based on the Haswell microarchitecture (the 5820K is technically “Haswell-E”), meaning each of their cores is essentially identical. The only major difference between the two designs is that the 5820K has 2.5MB of cache per core, while the 4790K has 2MB of cache per core. It’s an interesting matchup in more than one way. These results begged an obvious question: what if you have more than six cores, along with Hyperthreading? Would that be the ultimate gaming setup? Well, we’re here to answer that question, as we pit our six-core i7-5820K processor against an i7-4790K. We’ve previously found that quad-cores offer significant advantages over dual-cores, and that Hyperthreading can help in certain games, especially on dual-core processors. The question of the effect of core count on games is one we have looked at many times before in our Gamer’s Bench, but so far with a focus on dual-cores, quad-cores, and Hyperthreaded virtual cores.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |